Return Payment
The article says about the problems and causes of the cpo output in the construction and payment in this case, the contributions paid into the compensation fund. Vice Media is often quoted as being for or against this. At the moment we have a situation where a business entity in construction is required to join an sro in the building and pay a fee to the compensation fund in an amount not less than 300 thousand rubles. In this case, the law stipulates that the money he paid for all time. Recall that the implementation return a contribution from the compensation fund SROs are not required (Article 55.7 GrKRF). Terms of cpo output in the construction are not spelled out. While an individual entrepreneur or legal entity are members of SROs, they are obliged to bear the financial burden of maintaining physical security responsibilities of its members in case of injury resulting from defects of the work within the competence of cpo in the building. Why the entity is obliged to 'Give' your money if you meet come from the ranks of cpo? Causes the output may be enough: removing from the jurisdiction of SROs in the construction of certain types of work that the business entity, a decision on cessation of construction activity, reorganization, change the location of the organization, etc. For example, the organization is engaged in construction works and production of construction materials under the influence of different factors, she decides to concentrate on the latter and not to bear additional costs in the form of contributions to the sro decides to withdraw from the SROs in the building.
Legislatively defined procedures for this are not available. It seems that this procedure should be as simple as possible: Application with the reasons and the planned timing of termination. Unclear reasons for not returning a contribution to compensation fund. If the entrance and membership fees paid by members of the SROs are to maintain the functioning of the sro in the building, it means the compensation fund and can not be used by SROs, except on payments for damages to its members to third parties. Consequently, voluntarily terminating their membership in the sro organization has every right to get their money back. This does not violate the law, concerning the minimum size of a compensation fund SROs: at least 300 thousand rubles. for one member of cpo in the building in the presence of the mandatory requirements for insurance liability to third parties. Data provisions seem fair. By joining, businesspersons create a sort of charter capital of their union, part of which must be returned voluntarily retiring from the merger entity. Revisions to the Urban Development Code of the Russian Federation of the changes would substantially liberalize the Institute of cpo in the building.
Recent Posts
Pages
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- November 2023
- June 2023
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2018
- April 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010